Floath compares online casinos on the things that decide whether an account is worth opening: how long money takes to come out, what a bonus actually requires before it converts, who regulates the operator, and what the product is like to use on a phone. Every one of those is stored as a structured field rather than written as prose, so the same record powers the review page, the comparison table, the country page and the payment-method page without anyone rewriting it.
The output of that is the Floath Score: seven categories, each scored 0–100, combined with published weights. The overall figure is calculated when a page is rendered and is never stored on a record, so there is no hand-set number anywhere that can drift away from the categories underneath it.
What the platform covers
- Operator records
- 18
- All unscored in the current set
- Markets
- 5
- GB, Ireland, Canada, New Zealand, South Africa
- Rating categories
- 7
- Weighted, and the weights are published
- Payment methods
- 12
- Compared per market, not globally
Alongside those sit 10 game categories, 10 explainer guides, 7 regulator profiles and 8 curated comparison pages. Each market page carries its own regulatory picture, its local payment rails and the real support organisations for that jurisdiction — those services are the one part of the site that is never generalised across markets, because a helpline that cannot take your call is worse than no helpline.
How a record gets written
- The operator's own pages are read for the cashier terms, the bonus terms and the licensing statement — not the marketing copy on the homepage.
- Each figure is recorded as a typed field: a withdrawal band and an hour count, a wagering multiplier and what it applies to, a minimum deposit and its currency.
- A source row is written for every field that was checked, naming what was read and the date it was read. There are 35 of those rows behind the current set.
- Each of the seven categories is scored 0–100 with a one-line rationale, and the reviewer who set it is named on the record.
- The record carries a next-review date. When that date passes, the freshness dashboard marks it outdated whether or not anyone noticed.
The team
| Person | Role | What they own |
|---|---|---|
| Ruth Adeyemi | Head of ratings | The score model: category definitions, weights, and the evidence each score has to rest on. Signs off rating changes before they go live. |
| Tom Brennan | Payments editor | How money moves: which rails are live in which market, real processing windows, where fees appear, and when verification is asked for. |
| Sofia Marek | Bonus analyst | Bonus terms as structured fields — multiplier, what it applies to, game weighting, max bet and expiry — rather than as offer copy. |
| Daniel Okoye | Product reviewer | Registration, cashier, lobby, mobile and support, written up as what actually happens, including the parts that are slower than advertised. |
That is the whole team. No qualifications, employers, awards or prior careers are asserted for any of them, because none is recorded in the platform. The bios describe the job, not a CV, and they will stay that way until there is something verifiable to add.
How Floath is funded
By affiliate commission. When a reader opens an account through an operator link here, the operator's programme pays Floath — a revenue share or a one-off fee, depending on the contract. The commission is paid by the operator and is not added to your deposit.
That arrangement funds a site that ranks the same operators, which is a real conflict rather than a footnote. What the platform does about it is structural: the ordering of every list is derived from category scores and weights, there is no placement or commission field anywhere in the casino or score schema, and the affiliate records are read only by the click redirect. The full version of that argument, including the parts we cannot prove, is on the affiliate disclosure page.
What this page does not claim
- No company registration, ownership structure, incorporation date or funding history — none is recorded in the platform, so none is stated here. When there is one, it will appear on this page.
- No claim to be the only independent comparison site, and no third party has audited the score model or the weights.
- No user reviews, complaint counts, payout tests or satisfaction figures, because none have been collected. Where a review page has a reputation section, it says exactly that.
- No operator on this site is presented as fully verified. The four brands listed carry a verified affiliate destination and a verified product mix; their deposits, withdrawals, game counts, payment methods and support are not verified, so they are shown unscored.